Why We’re Getting Imposter Syndrome All Wrong

The usual tips aren't working because nobody's told you what's actually going on underneath. Stop trying to fix yourself….and start understanding your brain.

You've probably heard of the pink tax. It’s the invisible surcharge women pay for the same products, razors, body lotion, deodorant, simply because they're designed for female buyers. It's a pricing practice presented as neutral market logic. The cost is real, the unfairness is baked in, and most women just absorb it, because no one flags it at the till.

There's a version of this happening inside the minds of women every single day. I call it the confidence tax.

It might not show up on a receipt, but after more than a decade coaching founders and senior professionals, I can tell you exactly where it shows up. We see it in the fee quote you sent that was 30% lower than it should have been, or in the promotion you didn't go for because you told yourself you weren't quite ready yet. 

It shows up in the idea you floated tentatively in a meeting, watched someone else state more boldly, then watched them get the credit for, and in the creative work you held back from sharing because it didn't feel finished enough, polished enough, good enough.

That is the confidence tax…and imposter syndrome is how it gets collected.

Why the usual advice doesn't stop the charge

We talk about and hear about imposter syndrome constantly now. There are entire industries built around it - courses, podcasts, affirmation journals, hype folders where you screenshot compliments and log your wins. All of that has genuine value. A hype folder on a hard day? Useful. A record of what you've actually done? Worth keeping. The problem is not the tools. The problem is that they treat imposter feelings as a confidence problem, so the solution is always to add more confidence.

The tax keeps getting collected anyway. Because the confidence tax is not fundamentally about confidence. It is about what the brain has learned it costs to be seen.

What the brain actually learned

The psychologists who first described this experience in 1978 called it the impostor phenomenon, not a syndrome. So what’s the difference? A phenomenon is something that happens in context. A syndrome implies something is wrong with you. And that distinction matters, because the moment we pathologised it, we handed women another thing to fix about themselves, rather than asking the more useful question of what was the original function of this pattern?

When I work with women carrying heavy imposter feelings, something consistently surfaces. At some point, often much earlier than their professional life, many of them learned that being visibly capable came with a social cost. Being too certain, too direct, or too comfortable with being known for their competence had consequences. So the brain learned to manage the perception by holding success lightly, by attributing results to luck or the team or good timing. In other words, it did just enough to stay safe.

That cognitive habit was reasonable in the context that built it, but the problem is the brain keeps running it long after the environment that trained it has gone.

Think about the Strictly Come Dancing contestants learning a new style of dance every week. A ballroom dancer arrives with beautiful posture and a locked frame, and then has to perform Latin, where all of that rigidity works against them. The body keeps doing what it has always done because muscle memory is faster than conscious instruction. The professional has to actively interrupt the old pattern before the new one can bed in. The dancer isn't doing anything wrong, they’re just running a programme that belongs to a different floor. Our thought patterns work exactly the same way, often learned in one room but still running in another. They are simply a behaviour and a story that hasn't had the chance to update yet.

What the tax is really costing you

One of the women I worked with, a communications coach, had the experience, the track record, the results. And she still couldn't shake the feeling that if she put her prices up, someone would call her out on it. By the end of our work together she said she felt more empowered to change her prices and to choose who she worked with. The confidence was always there. The pattern running underneath it was the thing in the way.

Another client had spent years giving more than anyone had asked of her. She gave more time to clients who hadn't requested it, more energy to situations that didn't deserve it, and was always last on her own list. She described it as having lost her mojo somewhere along the way, though when we looked at the pattern underneath, she hadn't lost it at all. She'd been handing it over without noticing, because the old wiring said that being enough meant giving everything. By the end of our work together she said she'd got a massive dose of it back. What she'd actually done was stop paying a tax she'd been collecting from herself.

This is what I mean when I say the confidence tax has consequences. It shows up in pay cheques and prices, yes. But it’s also evident in the things we make and never share, the rooms we don't walk into, the version of ourselves we keep just slightly out of reach.

How you stop paying it

The work that actually interrupts this pattern is less about confidence-building and more about pattern recognition. It’s about learning to notice the moment the tax is about to be collected, and making a different choice.

The question I find most useful when the self-doubt fires is not "do I deserve this?" because that framing has no good answer. The useful question is: is this feeling telling me something true right now, or is this an old bill from a previous environment?

I'll tell you where I landed on all of this, personally. I was in a conversation once where someone was bulldozing their way through a room on the basis of volume and certainty rather than actual knowledge. I said something that ended up on a t-shirt: let me interrupt your overconfidence with my expertise.

It got a laugh, but it was also entirely serious.

Because what I want you to take from this is not that overconfidence is the goal. It's that your expertise is already currency, already earned, already real, and the confidence tax is what happens when the brain's old accounting system keeps discounting it before you've even had a chance to spend it. You are not in that room any more.

And I say that not as a motivational line on a poster, but as something I have watched women come to understand, slowly and then all at once, when they finally stop treating the feeling as truth and start treating it as data.

The evidence is already there. The capability is already there. What changes is the decision to stop paying a levy you were never actually supposed to carry.

_

Cat Paterson is a Behavioural Intelligence Strategist, former government intelligence analyst, and creator of behavioural intelligence methodologies that help founders, business owners, and senior leaders identify the hidden patterns shaping decisions, performance and change. Find our more at https://catpaterson.com/ or on Instagram at @catpatersonstg